Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Fwd: Bobby, stand with us today:



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Energy Nation" <info@energynation.org>
Date: July 31, 2013 5:20:06 PM GMT-06:00
To: <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>
Subject: Bobby, stand with us today:

Dispatch from Energy Nation

Bobby --

You're probably sick of hearing about how "biofuels are better for the environment."

We know we are -- so we want to make sure everyone knows the facts and takes action.

Here are the top 5 reasons biofuel mandates in the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) are actually bad for the environment:

  1. Producing and consuming corn ethanol could double greenhouse gas emissions over the next 30 years.
  2. 19,000,000 more acres of corn have been planted this year than were planted 7 years ago. Using more land for corn takes a major toll on America's grassland and wetlands.
  3. We'll need to convert another 30 to 60 million acres of land into farmland by 2022 to meet the rising biofuel requirements that the RFS demands.
  4. Ethanol contains 33% less energy per gallon than gasoline, lowering your car's fuel economy.
  5. It takes 3 to 6 times the water to produce ethanol than to produce gasoline.

It's clear this mandate isn't working. Help us repeal it today.

Thank you for your support,
The Energy Nation Team

We Are Energy Nation

Energy Nation brings together the hard-working people of America's oil and natural gas industry to ensure our voices are heard by our nation's policy makers. We are the employees, retirees, vendors, and suppliers who develop and deliver the energy that fuels the American economy and way of life.

We're talking about energy in America online. Join the conversation. EN Facebook Twitter LinkedIn GooglePlus YouTube

View Email in Browser | Update Your Preferences | Unsubscribe | 1220 L Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005-4070

tradeoff is that to give up the Keystone Pipeline and replace that power with solar thermal power would require over 100 of these 3,500 acre plants. Or, to think of it another way, 3.5 days of flow through Keystone XL would provide the annual energy equivalent of the BrightSource project. | keeptheshuttleflying.com

http://keeptheshuttleflying.com/?p=889&preview=true&preview_id=889&preview_nonce=c400dcc9fb


Sent from my iPad

Monday, July 15, 2013

Inept leaders in dc

After spending all the money/effort on shuttle, developing the most capable vehicle on earth, placing Hubble & ISS in orbit, the ignorant fools in dc place it in a museum. This also places Hubble & ISS in danger. Additionally, ISS can't be operated as efficiently. What a bunch of idiots/morons running this country! Their ineptness is destroying many areas of the US economy.

Sent from my iPad

Friday, July 12, 2013

Fwd: Should the EPA have control over your gas tank?



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Bob Livingston" <eletter@news.personalliberty.com>
Date: July 12, 2013 10:08:56 AM GMT-06:00
To: Bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com
Subject: Should the EPA have control over your gas tank?
Reply-To: eletter@personalliberty.com

Should the EPA have control over your gas tank?

Bobby, thanks for subscribing since 01/16/2012View as Webpage | White List Us | Unsubscribe

Personal Liberty

Dear Bobby,

Please find below a special message from our friends at Energy Citizens. They have some important information to share with you.

Sincerely,
Bob Livingston
Bob Livingston
Editor, Personal Liberty Digest™
Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter™



Dear Bobby:

Every week, Americans across the nation rely on their cars, trucks, and SUVs to get to work, take their kids to school, and run their businesses. Almost every week, hard-working Americans need to stop at their local gas station to fuel up.

The last thing we need to worry about is what "blend" of fuel the EPA thinks we should put in our gas tanks.

But that's not what Congress was considering when they passed the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). The standard mandated that gradually increasing amounts of biofuels be blended into gasoline and diesel. However, when they set this arbitrary amount, they didn't realize that the amount of gasoline and diesel we are using is steadily decreasing. In short, there is not enough gasoline and diesel to absorb the biofuel.

We need to tell Congress that the Renewable Fuel Standard is not the right answer for American's energy strategy.

Failure to repeal the Renewable Fuel Standard this year will create big problems for American consumers:

  • Ethanol blends above 10% could damage millions of vehicles on the road today and void engine warranties;
  • Higher ethanol blends could harm gas station infrastructure;
  • The economic damage will impact everyone.
The answer is clear: The RFS is an unworkable federal mandate that must be repealed. Take action today!

Sincerely,

Energy Citizens


TO UNSUBSCRIBE:
You subscribed to Personal Liberty Digest™ on 01/16/2012 and are receiving this email at Bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com because you indicated an interest in receiving special updates and offers from Personal Liberty Alerts. We hope you'll find these updates interesting and informative. But if you'd rather not receive them, click here. You will be immediately removed from our database. Remember, your personal information will never be rented or sold and you may unsubscribe at any time.


Personal Liberty Digest
P.O. Box 1105
Cullman, AL 35056

Our Privacy Policy

Thursday, July 11, 2013

Green energy is truly a myth!

Percentage by source (fossil, nuclear , wind, solar) are:
Fossil: 86%
non fossil: hydroelectric 6%
                   Nuclear.        8%
                   Others.          0.9%

Other—– solar, wind , geothermal, wood, waste

Bho says drilling not the answer.  Looking at these numbers, the USA and world are going to RUN out if we don't use fossil fuels.  Green energy is truly a myth.  Simple as that.  Look at the fossil reserves below in the USA .  Apparently, bho is not very intelligent—I sort of had that feeling

It was estimated by the Energy Information Administration that in 2007 primary sources of energy consisted of petroleum 36.0%, coal 27.4%, natural gas 23.0%, amounting to an 86.4% share for fossil fuels in primary energy consumption in the world.[4] Non-fossil sources in 2006 included hydroelectric 6.3%, nuclear 8.5%, and others (geothermal, solar,tide, wind, wood, waste) amounting to 0.9%.[5] World energy consumption was growing about 2.3% per year.

Levels of primary energy sources are the reserves in the ground. Flows are production. The most important part of primary energy sources are the carbon based fossil energy sources. Coal, oil, and natural gas provided 79.6% of primary energy production during 2002 (in million tonnes of oil equivalent (mtoe)) (34.9+23.5+21.2).
Levels (proved reserves) during 2005–2007
Coal: 997,748 million short tonnes (905 billion metric tonnes),[13] 4,416 billion barrels (702.1 km3) of oil equivalent
Oil: 1,119 billion barrels (177.9 km3) to 1,317 billion barrels (209.4 km3)[14]
Natural gas: 6,183–6,381 trillion cubic feet (175–181 trillion cubic metres),[14] 1,161 billion barrels (184.6×109 m3) of oil equivalent
Flows (daily production) during 2006
Coal: 18,476,127 short tonnes (16,761,260 metric tonnes),[15] 52,000,000 barrels (8,300,000 m3) of oil equivalent per day
Oil: 84,000,000 barrels per day (13,400,000 m3/d)[16]
Natural gas: 104,435 billion cubic feet (2,960 billion cubic metres),[17] 19,000,000 barrels (3,000,000 m3) of oil equivalent per day
Years of production left in the ground with the current proved reserves and flows above
Coal: 148 years
Oil: 43 years
Natural gas: 61 years
Years of production left in the ground with the most optimistic proved reserve estimates (Oil & Gas Journal, World Oil)[citation needed]
Coal: 417 years
Oil: 43 years
Natural gas: 167 years

However, a recent  technological breakthrough has opened up the Bakken's massive reserves,

and we now have access of up to 500 billion barrels. And because this is  light, sweet oil,

those billions of barrels will cost Americans just $16  PER BARREL !!!!!!

That's enough crude to fully fuel the American economy  for 2041 years straight.

And if THAT didn't throw you on the floor, then  this next one should – because it's from 2006 !!!!!!

U. S. Oil Discovery  – Largest Reserve in the World

Stansberry Report Online -  4/20/2006

Hidden 1,000 feet beneath the surface of the Rocky Mountains  lies the largest untapped oil reserve in the world.

It is more than 2  TRILLION barrels. On August 8, 2005 President Bush mandated its extraction.

In three and a half years of high oil prices none has been extracted.

With this motherload of oil why are we still fighting over off-shore  drilling?

They reported this stunning news:

We have more oil  inside our borders, than all the other proven reserves on earth.

Here  are the official estimates:

8 times as much oil as Saudi Arabia

18  times as much oil as Iraq

21 times as much oil as Kuwait

22 times  as much oil as Iran

500 times as much oil as Yemen

and it's all  right here in the Western United States !!!!!!

HOW can this BE? HOW can  we NOT BE extracting this? Because the environmentalists and others have blocked  all efforts to help America become independent of foreign oil! Again, we are  letting a small group of people dictate our lives and our economy.  WHY?

James Bartis, lead researcher with the study says we've got more oil  in this very compact area than the entire Middle East, more than 2 TRILLION  barrels untapped. That's more than all the proven oil reserves of crude oil in  the world today, reports The Denver Post.



Sent from my iPad