Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Bob & Emile Martin <bobandemileinoakwood@gmail.com>
Date: November 16, 2012 8:36:27 PM CST
To: bobbygmartin1938.casperf@blogger.com
Subject: Fwd: EPA lies
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:From: Bob & Emile Martin <bobandemileinoakwood@gmail.com>
Date: November 16, 2012 8:23:13 PM CST
To: bobbygmartin1938.casper@blogger.com, bobbygmartin1938.casperx@blogger.com, bobbygmartin1938.caspere@blogger.com
Subject: EPA liesSent from my iPad
A federal judge has recently ruled against the EPA's violation of the law in issuing its ruling against the coal mining industry.
In late December, the Wall Street Journal published a revealing editorial on the EPA's lies and disinformation over hydraulic fracturing in a small town called Pavillion in Wyoming.
The editorial notes:
The EPA says it launched the study in response to complaints "regarding objectionable taste and odor problems in well water." What it doesn't say is that the U.S. Geological Survey has detected organic chemicals in the well water in Pavillion (population 175) for at least 50 years—long before fracking was employed. There are other problems with the study that either the EPA failed to disclose or the press has given little attention to:
*The EPA study concedes that "detections in drinking water wells are generally below [i.e., in compliance with] established health and safety standards." The dangerous compound EPA says it found in the drinking wells was 2-butoxyethyl phosphate. The Petroleum Association of Wyoming says that 2-BE isn't an oil and gas chemical but is a common fire retardant used in association with plastics and plastic components used in drinking wells.
*The pollution detected by the EPA and alleged to be linked to fracking was found in deep-water "monitoring wells"—not the shallower drinking wells. It's far from certain that pollution in these deeper wells caused the pollution in drinking wells. The deep-water wells that EPA drilled are located near a natural gas reservoir. Encana Corp., which owns more than 100 wells around Pavillion, says it didn't "put the natural gas at the bottom of the EPA's deep monitoring wells. Nature did."
*To the extent that drilling chemicals have been detected in monitoring wells, the EPA admits this may result from "legacy pits," which are old wells that were drilled many years before fracking was employed. The EPA also concedes that the inferior design of Pavillion's old wells allows seepage into the water supply. Safer well construction of the kind normally practiced today might have prevented any contaminants from leaking into the water supply.
*The fracking in Pavillion takes place in unusually shallow wells of fewer than 1,000 to 1,500 feet deep. Most fracking today occurs 10,000 feet deep or more, far below drinking water wells, which are normally less than 500 feet. Even the EPA report acknowledges that Pavillion's drilling conditions are far different from other areas of the country, such as the Marcellus shale in Pennsylvania. This calls into question the relevance of the Wyoming finding to newer and more sophisticated fracking operations in more than 20 states.
In short, the EPA lies when convenient; leaves out facts when they don't support its anti-fossil fuel agenda; and engages in disinformation campaigns to push its overall agenda of destroying the energy industry in America. Of course, they lie. Telling the truth doesn't support the anti-energy agenda.
Read more at the Wall Street Journal.
Related posts:
No comments:
Post a Comment